YoYo2 Board

YoYo2 Board » YOYO2 board

Tech 5A can eat a bowl of dicks.

(38 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by Boxthor
  • Latest reply from unklesteve

  1. Sebby
    Member

    Just because don't look the same doesn't mean their tricks aren't similar. Since freehand has been mainstreamed so much more, and especially because all of the names you've mentioned (minus Miguel) regularly collaborate on their tricks, they undoubtedly going to look somewhat similar. That's not even with 5a in particular, that's everybody.

    To me, I get kind of annoyed with tech 5a because there is nothing differentiating each besides each mount. I can pinch strings together and hold a yo-yo in place to throw the counterweight for pretty much any mount, and as long as the yo-yo is spinning, I can do it, not much challenge to it other than actually devising which mounts to do it under. And not only does it seem repetitive and easy, there is almost absolutely no flow to it.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. As Jon-Rob said,
    hard tech 5A is hard. I don't do hard tech 5A. I do shitty tech 5A.
    But,
    JonRob's 5a isn't easy. At all. You can tell each trick apart from the other because the mounts are different.

    Also, please try and tell me with a straight face that Tyler Severance's 5A looks similar to Jake's 5A.

    I guess I just don't agree. Oh well.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. Sebby
    Member

    As someone who consistently hangs out with both of them, no they don't have the same styles. But that doesn't mean alot of basic elements they use aren't the same. They just build off of them differently. Plus, I feel as if Tyler changes up his style on stage, after all, the kid is smart and knows what he has to do to win. I've seen him do many amazing things that are not his "typical" style on stage while I'm chilling with him.

    And just because a trick is hard, does not mean it is visually appealing, or that is as hard as another trick. "Difficulty" in yo-yoing, baring physics, is relative to the person doing it. Right now alot of tech 5a might be "hard", just because it's new and hasn't been explored yet, and people have yet to really wrap their minds around the subject. They were probably saying the same thing about tricks such as bee-sting a while back.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. And just because a trick is hard, does not mean it is visually appealing, or that is as hard as another trick. "Difficulty" in yo-yoing, baring physics, is relative to the person doing it. Right now alot of tech 5a might be "hard", just because it's new and hasn't been explored yet, and people have yet to really wrap their minds around the subject. They were probably saying the same thing about tricks such as bee-sting a while back.
    qtf.

    and as for they use alot of the same basic elements. trapeze son!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  5. sebby, just so I can understand where you are coming from, could I ask you to provide an example? after all, you DO hang out with them more than I do (which is not at all, I'm just going by their freestyles).
    by basic element what exactly do you mean? a mount, or movement?

    basically, I just want an example so I can understand where you are coming from.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  6. Sebby
    Member

    *sigh*.

    Crossarm movements, chopsticks in to tech 5a. Probably more but I just finished with a final exam and I don't feel like looking. Not only that but I have traded tricks with both of them and each of them have some basic elements of my tricks in their freestyles, and vice versa. If you want to look at some of that evolution over the years, look at my freestyles from Worlds 05 and Nats o6 and 07. Just proof of some of how 5a has mainstreamed a little.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  7. i haven't been doing 5A much lately, because i don't want to be in the spotlight of a style along with people who are telling kids how they should play fucking yo-yo. i could care less what steve wants or meant 5A to look like, i'll do whatever tricks i want. 5A is whatever you make of it, just stop copying people and stop labeling shit with tech 5A and flashy 5A and pointwhore 5A and just do something new.

    it's fucking dumb to call someones style bad just because it doesn't look like Miggy. Miggy is the shit, we all know, and there's not room enough for more Miggys so everyone else can do their own thing, what's wrong with that?

    to sum it up, stop complaining about "tech 5A". if you don't like it, make up something better and shove it in everyones faces.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  8. I'm rolling in my fucking grave.

    Posted 7 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.